Until very recently you know as recently as 1910 or so, Rudolf Otto who was a great philosopher of religious experience. He defined god as the wholly and totally other. Well, to somebody raised on tabloid newspapers in 50s science fiction the wholly…

…our maps of our self and our psyche? And that for me was the contact with what I call and I didn't call it this Rudolf Otto called it this, and this term influenced Jung. Otto preceded Jung was it is the wholly other, and if there is an archetype of…

…for me was the contact with what I call and I didn't call it this Rudolf Otto called it this, and this term influenced Jung. Otto preceded Jung was it is the wholly other, and if there is an archetype of the wholly other then this is it but perhaps…

…how long ago we incorporated this nomenclature is I called it the other, and you know the German historian of religion Rudolf Otto, defined god as the holy other, the holy and totally other. He said this is somewhat like Nicholas Kusanis's theology of…

…our maps of our self and our psyche? And that for me was the contact with what I call and I didn't call it this Rudolf Otto called it this and this term influenced Jung Otto preceded Jung was it is the wholly other. And if there is an archetype of…

…for me was the contact with what I call and I didn't call it this Rudolf Otto called it this and this term influenced Jung Otto preceded Jung was it is the wholly other. And if there is an archetype of the wholly other then this is it but perhaps…