From the "Inspirational and Mystical" collection. Recorded at the Philosophical Research Society, Los Angeles.
Summary
The talk presents a broad philosophical and spiritual meditation on love, arguing that love is not a single emotion but a hierarchy of affections that extends from ordinary human relationships to divine reality. Drawing heavily on Neoplatonism, the speaker describes love as a ladder of values that includes love of God, love of truth, wisdom, gratitude, beauty, virtue, family, friendship, animals, and ultimately charity and compassion. The central claim is that love is the organizing principle of a good life and the foundation of moral conduct, social harmony, and spiritual fulfillment. The discussion begins with Neoplatonism, described as a fusion of philosophy and mysticism that flourished in Athens and Alexandria and influenced early Christian mysticism. In this framework, the highest form of love is love of God, while the highest conceivable form is God’s love for humanity, symbolized through sacrifice and salvation. From there, the speaker moves to love of truth, emphasizing that truth is difficult to define because human beings perceive reality differently. Truth is presented as a healing force that frees people from ignorance and reveals divine affection. Wisdom is then treated as love of truth, and gratitude is framed as another form of love because it is the gracious acceptance of good received. The speaker next expands love into the realm of beauty and the arts. Beauty is portrayed as an impersonal but deeply important object of affection, one that has existed since primitive culture and is expressed through music, painting, sculpture, dance, theater, and other aesthetic forms. The arts of Asia, especially Chinese painting, are cited as examples of reverence for the divine in nature and creation. Love of virtue is also emphasized as a necessary part of the triad of truth, beauty, and goodness, which together help define infinite affection. A major portion of the talk focuses on human relationships, especially family love, friendship, and social responsibility. The speaker argues that family love must be based on worthiness, mutual regard, and moral integrity rather than mere biological connection. Families held together only by duty, economics, or domination are described as unstable. Friendship is treated as a powerful and often more sincere bond than kinship, though it can be corrupted by ulterior motives. Love of country and devotion to government are also mentioned, but the speaker is skeptical of political corruption and insists that love carries responsibility for preserving integrity in public life. The talk then broadens to love of animals and all living things. The speaker recounts experiences in Nara, Japan, including the friendly deer at Kasuga Park and a ritual at a pond where children release goldfish as an act of liberation rather than possession. These stories illustrate a moral attitude of kinship with life and a refusal to destroy for sport or convenience. This theme is connected to Buddhist figures such as Kannon or Kuan Yin, the goddess of mercy, and Maitreya, the future Buddha associated with kindness. These figures symbolize compassion, self-sacrifice, and the refusal to seek personal liberation until others are also brought to peace. Christian teaching is woven throughout the talk, especially the idea that one cannot love God without loving one’s brother. Paul’s statement that faith, hope, and charity remain, with charity or love as the greatest, is used to support the argument that religion without active affection is incomplete. The speaker repeatedly insists that love must be practical, expressed through service, skill, and helpfulness. Education, science, art, and craftsmanship are all described as forms of divine expression that should be dedicated to the common good rather than selfish gain or destructive ends such as nuclear weapons. The speaker also addresses self-love, arguing that individuals must care for themselves in a morally serious way. Self-respect is not selfishness; rather, it means becoming worthy, disciplined, and aligned with the inner divine reality described by Emerson as the oversoul. Human beings are said to be living temples, consecrated to truth, beauty, love, and God. This metaphor is reinforced by references to cathedrals, churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples, which symbolize the sacredness of human life and the need for consecration. Happiness, the speaker says, is not a right but something earned through love, service, and integrity. The conclusion returns to the social and global implications of the theme. The speaker warns that self-interest, resentment, and ulterior motives have damaged homes, communities, and nations. Love is presented as the only force capable of healing these divisions. The final vision is one of humanity climbing from nationalism to internationalism, from racialism to interracialism, and from fragmented religions toward a unified faith grounded in love of God and service to one another. The talk ends with a hopeful call for kindness, compassion, and a more universal understanding of love as the basis of peace and human fulfillment.
Search every word, jump to any moment, and follow along with the audio.


