Search Uutter…
Search Uutter…
  • Home
  • Explore
  • Feed
  • Popular
Browse
  • Collections
  • Topics
  • Groups
  • Videos
  • Audio
  • Playlists
  • Quotes
  • Leaderboard
  • Suggest
  • Chats
Topics
Support Me ❤️

@ Uutter | Terms| Privacy| Blog| Support Me ❤️

    ⌘K
    LoginSign up
  1. Home
  2. Explore
  3. Feed
  4. Popular
  5. Collections
  6. Topics
  7. Groups
  8. Videos
  9. Audio
    • Playlists
    • Quotes
    • Leaderboard
    • Suggest
    • Chats
  10. Playlists
  11. Quotes
  12. Leaderboard
  13. Suggest
  14. Chats
  15. Suggest
  16. Chats
  17. avatar

    Rupert Sheldrake

    c/rupert-sheldrake

    Lectures, debates, and dialogues by biologist Rupert Sheldrake — morphic resonance, telepathy, and challenging materialist science.

    PostsSearchMentionsAnalytics
    All mentions

    Steven Pinker

    10 mentions across 5 talks in Rupert Sheldrake

    More from Steven Pinker
    Science Dogma ~ Banned TED Talk - Rupert Shedrake explains Censorship...1 mention
    42:57

    …of Advisors, the brain trust for TED, so-called, on the website, The main people in the area of consciousness studies are Steven Pinker and Daniel Dennett, both of whom are extreme militant atheists and materialists. We just don't know what kind of people…

    Rupert Sheldrake — On Scientism, Morphic Resonance and the Extended Mind | Episode 2043 mentions
    7:30

    …must be flawed and there's no point wasting time looking at it and actually A couple of years ago, the rationalist Steven Pinker wrote a book called Rationality in which he actually said there's no point looking at the evidence because we know it's…

    8:35

    …into school and university students all over the world, because this stuff goes pretty unchallenged within academic science. What's interesting is that Pinker also goes on at length in his book, The Blank Slate, that we are in fact not blank slates at all.…

    16:17

    …understandable reasons. But it's not because they're all fanatically committed to ideological materialism. There are some who really are. Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett. There are a number of people for whom this is a kind of lifelong crusade.…

    Sheldrake VS Shermer - a Debate on Science - How The Light Gets In 20232 mentions
    12:44

    …them is not worth taking seriously or even looking at. Now, I'll finish by saying that that's not just a vague accusation. Steven Pinker, in his book Rationality, where he argues for a rational and scientific approach, says that there's no need to look at…

    16:32

    …drawer problem and so on. This is very common, not just, in psychical research, but all research, right? So acknowledging that, Pinker is skeptical of half of these psych experiments. You're standing at the top of the escalator, you give more money than…

    Rupert Sheldrake v. Michael Shermer | On the edges of knowledge | Full discussion2 mentions
    12:44

    …them is not worth taking seriously or even looking at. Now, I'll finish by saying that that's not just a vague accusation. Steven Pinker, in his book Rationality, where he argues for a rational and scientific approach, says that there's no need to look at…

    16:32

    …file drawers called the file drawer problem. This is very common. in psychical research, but all research, right? So acknowledging that, Pinker is skeptical of half of these psych experiments. You're standing at the top of the escalator, you give more money…

    What is mainstream science hiding? | Rupert Sheldrake in conversation with Hilary Lawson2 mentions
    14:40

    …dismiss the evidence altogether and simply to say it's impossible, therefore the evidence must be flawed. Yes. That's, for example, Steven Pinker, who says that these things are impossible. In his book Rationality, he actually argued you don't need to look…

    15:22

    …And that debate actually happened at How the Light Gets In last year at Hay-on-Wye. And Michael Shermer did exactly what Pinker does, which is that he evaded the evidence at every step. He made general remarks about the fallibility of human judgment…