…Owns Are Coming Home and Other Unexplained Powers of Animals. This was criticised of course by sceptics and one of them was Richard Wiseman. I invited him to do his own experiments with this dog and he got virtually the same results as mine. In his…

…now been analyzed by several people, including Robert McLuhan in his book, Randy's Prize. And I think most people agree, even Richard Wiseman, that the data are actually more or less the same as my own. They actually support the same phenomenon. We've done…

…newsletter to change its name from the Paranormal Review. It was changed from... It used to be called the Psychical Researcher. When Richard Wiseman was editing it, he changed the name. I think it was Richard who changed it to the Paranormal Review. And I…

…wanted to score points and this happened in the forum of the media. And one of the people who raised these objections was Richard Wiseman, a previous holder of this post. So I invited him to do his own experiments with this dog, which he did. He did…

…mind. I read this critique of the dog experiment, and I want to know what your response to this is. This is from Richard Wiseman. Someone said, he is not convinced. He argues, he, as in Richard Wiseman. Have we told people what the dog experiment is?…

…what your response to this is. This is from Richard Wiseman. Someone said, he is not convinced. He argues, he, as in Richard Wiseman. Have we told people what the dog experiment is? Let us please, yeah. Please. Well, we should explain this, because no…

…I then appeared on a TV program in Britain that described this research, and they showed one of these experiments. Richard Wiseman is a hardcore materialist atheist skeptic type. He's a member of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, a militant campaigning…

…average of 4% of the time. It occasionally went to look at passing cats, as it did in my experiments. To my astonishment, Wiseman then appeared on television and in the media saying he'd refuted the psychic dog phenomenon and that the dog had gone to…

…books. There's a book called Randy's Prize about materialists and skeptics. There's a book called Heretics by somebody who interviewed Wiseman and went into this whole story. It's become a classic case of skeptical treatment of evidence and distortion of what…

…wanted to score points, and this happened in the forum of the media. And one of the people who raised these objections was Richard Wiseman, a previous holder of this post. So I invited him to do his own experiments with this dog, which he did. He did…

…time. There may be an experiment or bias. So the most famous one here was the replication by Marilyn Schlitz and Richard Wiseman. Richard Wiseman is a skeptic, Marilyn Schlitz is a believer. Okay, those terms are problematic, but whatever, they're kind of…

…may be an experiment or bias. So the most famous one here was the replication by Marilyn Schlitz and Richard Wiseman. Richard Wiseman is a skeptic, Marilyn Schlitz is a believer. Okay, those terms are problematic, but whatever, they're kind of in those two…

…They got positive results. They were never published. And when I asked to see the raw data, they'd been lost. Richard Wiseman, who did staring experiments got positive results first time around when the students were doing the staring. So he replaced…

…random times through closed circuit television. She produced positive effects. They changed when she was looking at them. Richard Wiseman, when he was looking, they didn't produce positive effects. Now, it's not symmetrical. She couldn't produce positive effects…

…been replicated by one of the leading skeptics in Britain who then pretended falsely that he hadn't replicated. And who is that? Richard Wiseman. And online on my website, you can see his data plotted on graphs showing exactly the same effect as I found.…

…time. There may be an experiment or bias. So the most famous one here was the replication by Marilyn Schlitz and Richard Wiseman. Richard Wiseman is a skeptic, Marilyn Schlitz is a believer. Okay, those terms are problematic, but whatever, they're kind of…

…may be an experiment or bias. So the most famous one here was the replication by Marilyn Schlitz and Richard Wiseman. Richard Wiseman is a skeptic, Marilyn Schlitz is a believer. Okay, those terms are problematic, but whatever, they're kind of in those two…

…They got positive results. They were never published. And when I asked to see the raw data, they'd been lost. Richard Wiseman, who did staring experiments got positive results first time around when the students were doing the staring. So he replaced…

…random times through closed circuit television. She produced positive effects. They changed when she was looking at them. Richard Wiseman, when he was looking, they didn't produce positive effects. Now, it's not symmetrical. She couldn't produce positive effects…