c/rupert-sheldrake
Lectures, debates, and dialogues by biologist Rupert Sheldrake — morphic resonance, telepathy, and challenging materialist science.
…in a way, tends towards us. You can add in a little bit of panpsychism. I've recently been reading the new book by Philip Goff, the philosopher who's a great advocate of panpsychism. And if you add that element in, then there's some sense in which The…
…here are all these parent panpsychists Does it help in understanding psi phenomena, parapsychological phenomena? And I actually asked Philip Goff, you know, and he said no, you know, because basically everything stays the same, we just interpret it…
…analytic philosophy of mind, because it seems to me that, yes, Whitehead is a kind of panpsychist, but unlike Philip Goff and other analytic philosophers who are toying with panpsychism, Whitehead has a process relational ontology that grounds his panpsychism,…
…But yes, I think Whitehead's panpsychism on this process-oriented ontological basis is as different from the substance-oriented panpsychisms like Goff as it is from materialism. So there's a real difference here in the way that Whitehead is approaching…
…there's a real difference here in the way that Whitehead is approaching panpsychism that I'm hoping to get into when I speak to Philip Goff next month. So stay tuned for that. Well, I liked your paper. I thought you brought this out very well. In fact,…
…this is why many contemporary philosophers are now going over to panpsychism. Another one whose book recently came out is Philip Goff, his book Galileo's Error, is a clear and I think forceful and well-argued statement of the panpsychist position. And his…
…interesting point about this panpsychist argument in the present climate is that most panpsychists who are around today, Straussen, Goff, Tononi, Koch, the neuroscientist who used to work with Francis Crick, who used to be an absolutely hardline reductionist…