…have to read the evidence. And I said, well... You know, if you have such a strong opinion without reading the evidence, Dan, there's a name for that. It's called prejudice. And he got terribly angry. And it triggers off very strong emotional reactions…

…which was a bit of an effort, because I was convinced this is true. So I think that the precognitive dreams that Dan showed, most people probably have them except they forget them because they forget most of their dreams and they're often about trivial…

…now in a position thank god to to to get away from but At the moment, I ask, for instance, Oliver or Dan, is nature non-moral, not amoral, non-moral? Which nature? The nature that includes humanity or the nature that excludes humanity? No, nature that…

…those forests are there. But from the trees' point of view, it's a terrible waste. When you talk about humans and other species, Dan, you said that if you say that humans have, for instance, souls, the other species have not. You said there isn't such a…

…call, I mean... What we can conceive of as conceivable mechanistic models covers an enormous... I mean, take the point that Dan made earlier about the difference between plants and animals. I mean, for a long time, our philosophical colleagues were arguing…

…game, then even Steve might be... I'd probably take two seats or something. No, I mean, Sir David, I think the... I'm sure what Dan was saying was that down the road somewhere we shall get to the point at which we shall know how to specify what a…

…it is. And that doesn't seem to me to be a very outrageous thing to say. You said before he's just going about Dan. He's just going to keep people in the business of trying to reconcile our everyday understanding with an out-of-date view on physics.…

…Dennett, who's a fellow, a materialist philosopher and a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. And I said to him, Dan, do you think that parapsychology is a pseudoscience? He said, of course it is. He said, because it's investigating phenomena that…